Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ 



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Q26
 Post Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 3:15 pm 
Offline
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
Thanks Received: 0

Posts: 22

Joined: August 10th, 2010
 
Can you please go over Q26?


Top 
  Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: PT37 S1 Q26
 Post Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 2:46 am 
Offline
LSAT Geek
User avatar
Thanks Received: 451

Posts: 1647

Joined: October 07th, 2009
 
Happy to help!

Answer choice (C) can be directly inferred from lines 47-52. The author states that the risks outweighed the objectively measurable value of the lost assets.

(A) has the author opposed to the accuracy of the researchers, which is not supported by the text. In fact the author consistently relies on the researchers in drawing support for his/her claims.
(B) has the same issue as answer choice (A).
(D) is unsupported by the passage. The author doesn't state the strategies concerning risks of loss in international crises are incomprehensible, just noteworthy in the unexpected nature of the strategies.
(E) is out of scope. The passage does not discuss cases involving unavoidable losses, but rather alternatives that would entail a sure loss if that alternative was chosen - slightly different.

Does that clear this one up?


Top 
  Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 

Search for: