Archive for category Uncategorized
Free LSAT Prep – Zen and the Art of LSAT with Brian Birdwell
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in Uncategorized on September 1st, 2011
Is the LSAT driving you mad? It has been known to have that effect on people. However, before you seek some form of professional help, check out our FREE public LSAT Class led by Brian Birdwell: Zen and the Art of LSAT.
Brian Birdwell, one of our 99th percentile rock star instructors, is worth the price of admission (okay, so it’s free, but seriously check him out!). He is the LSAT equivalent of the Dos Equis Guy. How many people do you know who have rode on a scooter for 70 miles in the pouring rain in Malaysia, sandwiched between a Thai kickboxing champion and an English hip-hop artist, or sold a million dollars worth of watermelon in 6 weeks? He just may be the most interesting man in LSAT prep.
As if hanging with Brian weren’t enough, what you’ll get out of his class is worth clearing your schedule for. Here’s how it works: you sign up and submit questions that you would like to see Brian cover during the session. Brian will sort through the submitted questions and teach as many as time will allow.
Bring your friends, bring your neighbors, even bring your shrink if you want; Brian Birdwell is dishing out LSAT peace of mind for the rock bottom price of $0.00.
Logic Creep
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in Uncategorized on August 11th, 2011

"...that's the flaw in your argument! Stop assuming one path of causation when multiple paths are possible! God!"
Have you noticed that your every day interactions are effected by your LSAT prep? Consider the following example:
Civilian: You’re an hour late, you seem drunk, and you forgot about our date. You !@#$ idiot.
LSAT Student: Darling, in order to draw that conclusion it’s necessary that you assume that I’m not late because I was building up the courage to tell you that I love you. And there is the flaw in your argument – it’s a classic case of concluding a certain explanation when many others would have sufficed.
One byproduct of a healthy dose of LSAT prep is the application of formal logic to one’s every day, non-LSAT-prep-related- life. You may not even realize this is happening at first, but trust me – this is a very real phenomenon and it will drive the people in your life bananas!
Since this is such an important issue – I mean let’s face it, it’s imperative that you preserve what is left of your social life– I have taken it upon myself to diagnose and (attempt to) treat this epidemic afflicting LSAT’ers everywhere.
My official diagnosis is ‘Logic Creep’ (every worthy affliction needs a label). Aside from doubling as the name all of your friends and family are calling you behind your back, it’s short and to the point.
So how can you get yourself to stop analyzing arguments in your personal life in terms of premises, conclusions, supporting principles, and assumptions? My advice is simple: don’t stop!
If you’ve trained your mind to scrutinize the logic of every argument you’re faced with in order to determine what assumptions it relies on and how certain evidence justifies or supports the argument, I’d say you’re heading for success in logical reasoning come test day.
However, if logic creep continues to be a problem in your personal relationships, try hitting them with a dose of their own medicine:
LSAT Student: “Your continued protests of my logical approach to our discourse is going to hinder my progress in getting a great LSAT score and you know how important that is to me. You must not love me!”
Manhattan LSAT Student Spotlight: Adam S.
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in Law School, LSAT Experiences, Student Spotlight, Uncategorized on July 21st, 2011
At Manhattan LSAT, teaching is what we do. We’re passionate about helping our students reach their LSAT goals, because at the end of the day, that’s what it is all about: our students. With that in mind, we are happy to debut a new ongoing segment of our blog: The Manhattan LSAT Student Spotlight. Every so often we will conduct a live interview with one of our alumni in order to share their experiences with current students
. Their insights on law school, LSAT prep, and life in the field of law can serve as valuable advice for many of you.
Our first alumni interview is with Adam S., soon to be a 2L at Georgetown University. Adam made time for a phone call with us a few weeks ago:
M LSAT: What is your educational and career background?
AS: I went to NYU and I was a philosophy major. I graduated in 2007. I went to public school before that in Maryland.
M LSAT: How did you come to choose a career in law? Did you choose your Philosophy major with that in mind?
AS: I didn’t have any inclination first of all when I came to college. I just simply didn’t know what I wanted to do for a year. I was undeclared when I came in and I decided on philosophy after taking a philosophy class that I liked a lot. Sort of the word among philosophy students is law school the reason why you do what you did. I think I got the idea from that, from hearing what other philosophy majors were saying. I did a substantial amount of research myself. I spoke with as many people as I could about the practice of law, about law school itself. I spoke with people who are lawyers now, people who are in law school now, people who are no longer lawyers because they didn’t like it. Ultimately I thought it would be the right thing for me.
M LSAT: Was there any one thing or any one person that you talked to that made up your mind for you? Or was it a gradual evolution?
AS: It was very much just speaking to a lot of people and it weighing on the side of seeming like a good thing for me. In college I did an internship where I was exposed to legal stuff, in the music industry, and I’d thought that I’d be an entertainment lawyer. The internship involved licensing agreements for a record label, Universal Music Group.
I wasn’t doing real legal work but I got a chance to read through legal agreements; it was my first time ever having to really do that and just to see what it is. I guess what I liked about law and what I think what ultimately attracted me to it after speaking with a lot of people, and then working, I sort of figured out that it’s an area in which one always has an opportunity to learn and be challenged and that seems to me to make for a fulfilling career.
M LSAT: How has your view of the law profession evolved as you progressed with your studies?
AS: In between going (to law school) I worked for two years at Royal Bank of Canada, in the legal department. So I worked with lawyers for about two and a half years before I came. That also influenced my view of what legal practice is like. It’s hard to say because I don’t know if I’ve ever had some clear view of what legal practice is like. Also, it can be very, very different depending on the area of where your practice is. I know that working at a law firm, or least I believe – I’ve never worked at a law firm before – but I have the sense that working at a law firm is very, very different than working in house, for a company like what I was doing.
There is a fair amount of common knowledge about law firm life being difficult – long hours, that kind of thing. It’s a hard question, a good question. There are many different types of law itself so it’s hard for me to answer generally. There are lots of sort of preconceived notions in our society about the quality of lawyers and such. And one of the things that I think, that’s been heartening for me, is coming to law school and seeing that law students, and particularly the law, is really a tool with which to make the biggest changes that one can in the way things work.
M LSAT: What led you to choose Manhattan LSAT for your test prep?
AS: Well, to be honest, my brother is friends with Andrew Yang [former CEO of MG Prep]. He’s actually one of the people that I spoke to about law school, because he went to law school. He definitely gave me an honest view; he didn’t like it. He was one of the best people to speak with because he had a lot of good insight about it. I think he was my brother’s teacher for GMAT and my brother found out they were doing a new LSAT program and he really thought that MGMAT was great so I decided to do this.
M LSAT: How was your experience with Manhattan LSAT?
AS: I would say that they did as good a job as possible at preparing me for the LSAT. It’s definitely a really challenging test and there are no real secrets to it. There is nothing you can say that, just by telling someone, will instantly make them improve by a lot. The insights, I thought, were really, really valuable. I was very, very, very happy with Manhattan LSAT.
M LSAT: How did you study for the test on your own time, outside of class?
AS: I studied for a long time for it. I started pretty early and, I actually took two Manhattan LSAT classes. They have a thing where you can do it for very inexpensively the second time around (editor’s note: $300 for a retake of a Manhattan LSAT class). So I took it once with Noah Teitelbaum and I took it with Aileen. They were both really just amazing teachers.
The way that I studied for it is by doing the exercises in the book. That’s definitely a necessary preliminary sort of thing. But the most important thing I did was just take practice tests over and over again. Normally I would do two sections at a time if I could, timed. Or one section at a time and then just go over the answers, just the drilling down nature of that, to make sure the things that you’re doing right you can do more quickly and the things you’re still struggling with don’t hold you back.
M LSAT: You said that practice tests were an effective strategy for you. Was there anything that you found that didn’t work or wasn’t helpful?
AS: I’d say that the most productive strategies are the ones that….I would say that it should be done timed, when you do practice problems. I think that was a really important thing, or at least it was a really important thing for me, because I think timing was the biggest issue for me. When I started, particularly, I was not finishing everything. It was very, very difficult for me to finish any section. So just trying to create the timing pressure that the real test imposes, that was really effective. I think in the beginning I didn’t really focus on that that as much. I mean, it’s just a matter of being realistic about what your strengths are where the challenges are and anything that isn’t focused on either improving your strengths or having the challenges not hold you back so much is probably not going to be as productive.
M LSAT: What was the best part of studying for the LSAT? What was the worst?
AS: I actually did like the LSAT class. I genuinely did like it. I mean, I found it enjoyable to go to class I think just because if someone is interested in law then they probably should enjoy things like this. I mean, I believe obviously it’s possible to not because you could be interested in law for all different reasons but just the idea of reasoning through something and talking about that and talking about how to approach an issue. That’s on the positive side.
The tough part is, when you’re trying to be at your best, it can be discouraging when you’re not doing as well as you want to. Obviously when you take the practice tests, you have good days and you have bad days and it can be scary.
M LSAT: Speaking of the practice test, how were you prepping before the course and what did you ultimately end up getting on the exam?
AS: I’m trying to remember what my first score was…before I took the class I think I took one or two exams myself. I think I scored in the high 150’s, like 158 or something like that. I truly am not confident that that’s correct. But before class I didn’t do much productive studying. I think I looked through some books but one of the best things about, or certainly an important thing for me, was just having structure to the study schedule that the class provides. And just sort of knowing, it sort of gives you a step by step how to go through the issues. The different questions, the different approaches to each question and it’s just like a very thorough system, which is something that I needed. So that was important for me. Ultimately, I got a 168.
M LSAT: What was your LSAT test day experience like?
AS: It was a crazy day. Aside from running late, and having the subway just not be running that day, and having to take a cab there and like running in at the last minute…. It truly is like a blur. It’s very hard to describe because there is so much adrenaline when you’re taking the test, I think, because you’ve been preparing for it for a long time and you know that it’s important.
They call “time to start” and, for me I think, it was very mechanical. That’s the point of taking the practice tests and that’s the point of taking the class. One of the greatest things about what I learned from class, was really just sort of the ‘play-to-your strengths’ thing I’ve mentioned already a couple of times. It’s just so critical, I think, to doing well. With an unlimited amount of time many people could do very well on it. But the whole point is that you have a limited amount of time to answer these questions. The ones that you can answer with the most ease should be done as quickly as possible and they should be done almost without thinking, just because you’re so used to seeing a question of that same structure, it’s just mechanical. You know it immediately, you bubble the answer, and then you move on. You don’t really want to sit there and meditate on anything, you don’t have time.
M LSAT: Earlier on you talked about how you spoke about speaking to many people about becoming a lawyer and their experiences in becoming a lawyer. What would you say now to someone who came to you considering going to law school? What would you tell them?
AS: I think I would be more positive about it than many of the people that I spoke with. Although, I’ve only been through one year of law school so I don’t have real insight about what it is to really be a lawyer that sort of the people I spoke with had.
I would say that I’m definitely biased about this but it seems to me that law school seems to me to be the greatest of intellectual experiences. That’s probably an overstatement but the point of it is just to sort of hone your critical thinking and reasoning skills and to make you clear and precise about the way you think about things and the way you express yourself and helping you to be persuasive. I think that it’s a really excellent thing to do intellectually. I doubt that it’s something that people should do unless they realistically think they want to be a lawyer. I mean, some people say it’s something you can do if you don’t want to be a lawyer but then some people say it’s something you can do if you don’t want to be a lawyer. I think that is not necessarily true.
M LSAT: What are your long term professional goals?
AS: That’s a good question, that’s a question that I have beginning to think about more recently. Generally, I would like to work in the private and the public sector, hopefully for the federal government at some point. Although, I don’t know exactly in what area I’d like to walk in.
M LSAT: Is there an idea scenario for you or do you have a dream job?
AS: I think it would be really sort of fascinating to work for an agency like the Federal Trade Commission. That’s something I was interested in before law school. You know, just being able to work on big, interesting issues would be great although, like I said, I need to do a lot more exploring to figure out what area I’d like to be in.
If you are a current or former Manhattan LSAT student that has an interesting LSAT experience to share, we’d love to hear from you! Shoot us an email to: StudentServices@manhattanlsat.com.
The LSAT and NFL Stardom
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in Uncategorized on March 4th, 2011
What do you want to do with your J.D.? That’s the $250,000 question for most of you. After all, there has to be an end game to all of this LSAT prep madness. The truth is, a legal education can take you many places that you may have thought previously unattainable. See exhibit A: NFL stardom.
Unbeknownst to most National Football League fans around the country today, the most important players to the future of the NFL are not named Brady or Manning, and are not getting paid tens of millions of dollars to chase a ball around. The future of the NFL actually lies in the hands of several attorneys, mediators, and decision makers who – not unlike yourselves – were recently sweating through many an LSAT workout routine.
The NFL is in the midst of the most crucial labor disputes in the history of American sports. The NFL Players Union and the NFL owner’s are intensely negotiating how they are going to split the 9 billion dollars in revenue that the league rakes in per year.
Armed with their representatives from every walk of legal life, both sides have been negotiating and mediating against a deadline that was set to expire at 11:59pm EST last night, March 3rd, 2011 which is when the current “Collective Bargaining Agreement” between the NFL Owner’s and the NFL Players Association expired. Both sides have just yesterday evening agreed to extend the deadline 24 hours, but one thing remains a certainty: Without a new agreement in place, the league faces a work stoppage until a new contract can be signed by both sides. Without an agreement, there will be no 2011 season, which means that their 9 billion dollar pie will go to waste.
While the sheer dollars at stake here are quite overwhelming, I find it more interesting to point out that one’s law school and NFL dreams need not be mutually exclusive. With a little work on Logic Games and a quick read through our new Logical Reasoning Strategy Guide, you could be the person who saves the fate of our country’s most popular professional sports league. Sure the agreement will almost certainly be reached by the time you are finished with law school, but keep this in mind: the next Collective Bargaining Agreement will absolutely expire at some point in the future, and when that time comes, there will be a need for contract law experts to work out the kinks of yet another contentious labor dispute.
So get studying; careers in contract law span just about all industries in our society; music, sports, art. Perhaps your dreams of stardom aren’t dead after all!
Here are some interesting stories about the ongoing negotiations from across the web:
President Obama Addresses NFL Labor Dispute – The Huffington Post
Issues in NFL Labor Negotiations – The New York Times
NFL Labor Timeline – The St. Petersburg Times
Fan’s View of NFL Labor Talks: Woe is Them – USA Today
Some Friday Levity
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in Uncategorized on February 25th, 2011
We all knew “that guy” (or girl) who couldn’t get enough of their own voice and opinion in the classroom. When the Professor asked a question, they would invariably raise their hand with a fervor and energy that can only be matched by a pack of twelve-year-old girls at a Justin Bieber concert. They had the answer to every question, studied twice as much as you for every test, and were – at least in their own minds – destined for greater things than you.
Well my law school hopeful friends, I have some good news and some bad news; first the bad: you will undoubtedly encounter these folks in large numbers as you journey through law school. So prevalent are these Poindexter’s that law school students have even come up with a term for them: gunners.
The good news?! You and your other, non over-zealous classmates have several years of jokes to make at their expense! See exhibit A: an incredibly talented group of George Washington University students have put together an excellent tribute to these classroom legends set to the tune of Cee Lo Green’s Grammy nominated mega hit “F*** You’.
Enjoy!
“Wait – You don’t have to take the LSAT for Law School Admission? Seriously?!?”
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in Admissions, Law School, LSAT in the news, Uncategorized on January 14th, 2011
If your LSAT spidey senses were particularly aflutter over the last 48 hours, it’s probably because a very interesting article was published by the National Law Journal Wednesday, creating a lot of buzz around the law school blog-o-sphere.
The article outlines the potential plans for the ABA to no longer require the LSAT to be taken in order to be admitted into Law School. I know, right – after all those cups of coffee, weeks without seeing family, friends, sunlight or SportsCenter!! Alas, take comfort: prospective law school students after you will be forced to suffer the same cruel and unusual punishment that is the LSAT.
This change in policy may be adopted, however it certainly does not signify the end of the dreaded exam. I think it very unlikely that the top law school programs will cease desiring prospective students to report an LSAT score, for the simple reason that they believe in the test’s diagnostic capabilities and gives them another quantifiable statistic to boast about. It’s no secret that the top schools want the top students, and the LSAT has been the standard for determining one’s ability to succeed in law school for the past million years (citation needed, but it’s been roughly that long). And as long as the top schools are requiring the scores, you can bet that others will follow suit.
What is more interesting to consider is the relevance of such a change in policy to the vaunted US News and World Report Rankings. Graduate programs in every style of ivory-tower architectural influence go to great lengths to ensure that they are as highly ranked as possible. Predictably, the average LSAT score of admitted students plays a role in where an institution will be ranked on this list.
Does this mean that schools might now admit certain students that they like without requiring LSAT scores? It’s possible, and this would certainly allow schools to be more liberal with their admission standards while still keep their precious average LSAT score statistics up to snuff. Lower tier schools may jump at the opportunity to disassociate themselves with the sub standard LSAT averages of their students by dropping the requirement. Only time will tell, but this seems to be a classic example of Shakespearean comedy: Much Ado About Nothing.
Check out some of the reactions from across the web:
http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2011/01/killthelsat.html
http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2011/01/will-the-aba-make-lsats-voluntary.html
The December 2010 LSAT is Taunting You
Posted by noah@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT Gossip, Uncategorized on January 5th, 2011
It’s been days and days – where the f@#$%@#$ is your score? Yeah, the folks at LSAC gave themselves until the 10th, but the LSAC operates like many airlines, giving us unreasonably late arrival times so that they have a spotless record of ontimeliness. We want to eat! We want to eat!
While you’re waiting, sign up for our Review the Dec. 2010 LSAT workshop (Tuesday, Jan 11th, 8pm EST, be there or be square sort of thing). We haven’t seen the test yet – we’re friends with the LSAC, but we’re not that close. We’re planning on focusing on the games, probably with an eye towards how to speed up. The scuttlebutt is that there was nothing new under the sun, but people got bogged down.
So what could LSAC be doing right now? Some possibilities:
1. Researching each and every one of your lives to figure out what score you deserve. (i.e. finding out if you’ve been naughty or nice)
2. Hand erasing your stray pencil marks as a gesture of good will.
3. Editing/laughing at/doodling on your essay.
4. Calculating the relationship between the raw scores, scaled scores and percentiles.
Don’t sweat it, the scores will be here shortly – good luck!
When Will They Release The June LSAT Scores?
Posted by noah@manhattanlsat.com in Uncategorized on June 9th, 2010
It can be agonizing waiting to hear about your LSAT score. Maybe the LSAC isn’t that in to you. Maybe it lost your number. It may simply be best to take up basket weaving or memorizing medieval poetry to take your mind off things. What I don’t recommend is refreshing your in-box every 5 minutes for the next 3 weeks! Take comfort in the fact that the LSAC is relatively consistent about their score release dates. Go ahead and read our summary of the LSAT score-release history so you can figure out when to start actually refreshing your in-box every 5 minutes
If you’re trying to decide whether to cancel, in general it’s best to have one great score on your record, but if the schools you’re applying to take your best score, a lower score won’t hurt. That said, if you know you bombed the exam — mis-bubbled, didn’t get to 2 games or passages when you usually finish all 4 — then canceling makes sense. More on this issue here.
In the meantime, good luck with basket-weaving.
Ye Olde’ Last Minute LSAT Tips for the June LSAT
Posted by noah@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT Prep, LSAT Tips, Uncategorized on June 1st, 2010
If you’re having a bit of an LSAT freak-out, take a break from your umpteenth preptest, stop negating assumptions and talking about contrapositives. Drink some tea (not Long Island), and read some tips:
Final tips from people other than your mother
Tips for chilling out and getting YOUR best score
What to do the night before the LSAT





