Archive for category LSAT Prep
Free LSAT Workshops!
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT Prep, Manhattan LSAT Announcements on January 27th, 2012
TGIF!
To celebrate the end of another work week, we’re announcing several free LSAT workshops, both Live Online and in New York City.
These 2 hours workshops will include a Logic Games and Logical Reasoning lesson, and will be led by some of our geekiest instructors. Did we mention that these are free?? Dates and links for signup are below.
Free LSAT workshops in New York:
Free Live Online LSAT Workshops:
Happy Studying!
What do YOU think of the Socratic method??
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT Prep, Uncategorized on November 11th, 2011
There was a very interesting news story on the web this week about a professor from Utah who has been denied tenure (and is now bringing a suit against his former University) due to negative evaluations submitted by his students. In the negative evaluations, students cited discontent with the professor “calling on them when they did not raise their hands” and “forcing them to work in groups”. The audacity! Don’t these profs know that being called on involuntarily could cause one to lose a hand on pokerstars.com?!

Beware: this is what could happen to your brain if you sit in a non-interactive, lecture style LSAT class!
The method of teaching used by this professor, most commonly referred to as the Socratic method, is designed to engage students in discussion in order to put the focus on a dialogue that uses argument and debate as the main process for coming to meaningful, logical understanding. If the words ‘arguments’ and ‘logical’ are setting your LSAT senses aflutter, this is for good reason: the Socratic method is incredibly useful in fostering the skills necessary achieve top scores on the LSAT.
If you’ve taken even a cursory gander at our website, you’ll likely have noticed that we tout our classes as “Interactive” and requiring “Hard Work”. If you read further than that, you’ll have seen us explicitly mention our use of the Socratic teaching method to best sharpen and build skills relevant to LSAT success.
We’ve designed our entire approach around fostering an environment conducive to learning the skills that you will need on test day to rock the exam. It’s one of the things that sets us apart; we put a true focus on mastering the skills necessary to answer every question on the LSAT exam – not the shortcuts/tricks that have worked for some question types from past exams. The best way to do this is to have small classes led by 99th percentile teachers who are well trained and experienced in implementing the Method de Socrates.
While you certainly could focus massive amounts of time spent prepping for the test trying to categorize and memorize every LSAT question type (and the associated “trick” to answering it) that has ever been surfaced on the exam, it’s much more useful to develop the skills that the test is specifically testing.
The never before seen LSAT curve ball is inevitable on test day. Without a proper skill set to fall back on, you’ll be searching for answers, and may very likely work yourself in to a panic that could throw off your timing and affect you on other sections of the test.
Perhaps the missing link in your LSAT prep is a little touch of Socrates. While most of our instructors certainly don’t look like Socrates (some ARE participating in Movember, so it can be hard to tell), and classes aren’t taught in the hills beneath an olive tree in the a Greek city-state, there is an awful lot of Socrates in the way we teach.
The Complete LSAT Retake Manifesto
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in Applications, LSAT Tips on November 1st, 2011

Was this your reaction when you saw your LSAT score? Yes? Keep reading.
Each time LSAC releases LSAT scores, there are thousands of test-takers who are less than satisfied with their results. Luckily for those folks, you are allowed to take the LSAT up to three times in any two year period. Unluckily for them, the decision as to whether a retake is “worth it” is hardly a straightforward one. Enter the Manhattan LSAT Retake Manifesto.
In the coming paragraphs, we hope to address all of the concerns that a potential LSAT retaker may have – or really should have – before deciding what their next course of action is.
Initial Considerations
Let’s start with a dose of reality. Most people see very little improvement in their LSAT score after retaking (an average of roughly two points for folks who scored between 150 and 167 the first time), and some even see a decrease in their score. Take a look at the below chart for some analysis of the success of 2010-2011 ‘retakers’ with various initial scores:

*Data courtesy of LSAC.org’s 2010-2011 “repeater” statistics (pdf).
The most important take away from this data is the marginal nature of the score increases that repeat LSAT takers tend to achieve. Just because something is unlikely, however, does not make it impossible, especially when there are some repeaters scoring worse, telling us that some people do significantly better than the 2 or so point average increase. Furthermore, there are very legitimate circumstances that may have applied to your first attempt at the LSAT that prevented you from realizing your full potential.
When considering a retake, it is important to make an honest assessment of your efforts the first time around. Here are the important questions you must ask yourself in order to avoid becoming the next sad repeater statistic:
Did I study like hell the first time I took the exam?
There are a large number of test takers who underestimate the beast that is the LSAT. The LSAT is a very difficult exam, and in taking it you should assume you are competing with the upper quartile of college students nationwide. If you approached your LSAT prep with the same fervor as your SAT prep, you’re in trouble. That would be the equivalent of jogging a two miles a day to train for a marathon. Simply put, you should ask yourself whether you underestimated this test. If your answer is yes, you are a prime candidate for a retake. If your answer is no, read on.
Did I have a “bad day” when I took the exam?
When we say “bad day” here, we’re referring to everything from the completely and totally disastrous, to the mildly distracting. First, the completely disastrous: if Murphy’s Law inconveniently applied itself to your test day experience, you should have a good sense of this and how it negatively affected your score. Were you late for your exam? Did you get sick half way through it? Did a motorcycle gang decide to ride up and down the street your test center was located on during the Logic Games section? Was there a guy nervously tapping his foot on your chair throughout the test? Did the proctor flirt with you during the break and totally mess with your concentration? Were you abducted by Aliens during the break? If your answer is yes, hopefully you had the foresight to “cancel” (even extra terrestrials should have internet access), and are rightly plotting your course toward the next exam date.
Unlike the completely disastrous scenarios, slight distractions are more likely to rear their ugly heads again in future test implementations. If you found yourself slightly distracted on test day, you need to decide whether or not you believe you can overcome similar scenarios in the future. Was it really your neighbor tapping his or her pencil on their desk that destroyed your focus, or are you predisposed to test anxiety? Identifying whether truly external and unpredictable factors negatively affected your test experience is a crucial component to your retake decision. It can be unnerving to take such a high stakes test in a tense room full of prospective lawyers, but unfortunately that is part of the game day experience.
I prepped really hard, but did I prep long enough?
The LSAT is one of the harder or the hardest standardized exam that many people ever face. The skills it assesses are not only learned in 3 months of prep—they’re gained through a decade of rigorous high school and college courses. That’s not to say that someone who spent college staring at the bottom of a beer mug can’t do well on the LSAT, but it does mean that it may take some people longer than the usual 3-4 months to get to their best score. Tips and tricks can get you only a few points, really hitting your top means cleaning up and speeding up your thinking—and that’s not done in a weekend workshop!
I prepped really hard, but did I prep smart?
If you’ve read this far, I’m going to assume that you put in the effort in prepping for your LSAT. The question to ask yourself now is: was that effort the best use of my time? In other words, did my LSAT prep suck?
Let’s face it, there are many, many options out there for preparing for the beast that is the LSAT. It could be that you signed up for the first course that caught your eye (or perhaps the cheapest available option), and it simply didn’t cut it for you. At Manhattan LSAT, we firmly believe that the second most important factor in one’s LSAT prep, after their own hard work, is the quality of the instruction and the materials that they use to study.
Perhaps this time around you’ll want to add a structure to your self-study regiment. We have seen countless examples of structure alone being a “make or break” factor in one’s LSAT prep. Working through the quality material in the order that a 99th percentile professional LSAT tutor/curriculum developer has put together can make all the difference in the world. Or maybe you need to take a class (or a different class, if you took one that didn’t work for you).
Whatever your situation may be, do not think that you can continue to study for your next LSAT the same way that you studied for your initial test and receive greater results – provided you did put indeed put in the effort that first time. Doing so is the definition of insanity!
The Next Things to Consider
Admissions Policies of Your Target Law School
So you’ve taken the LSAT, did not cancel, and are not 100% satisfied with your score. You have reflected on what happened on test day, as well as on your LSAT prep. You’re convinced you have a higher score in you. Does that mean you should register today for the next exam administration? Not quite. You need to think about the schools that you’re trying to get in to, and what their policies on multiple LSAT scores are.
Earlier this year we did some research on what top law schools admission policies pertaining to multiple LSAT scores are. Four of the top ten (from US News and World Report’s 2010 rankings) said they would consider only the highest LSAT score on an applicant’s score report. Two schools said they would take an average, and four considered their review of applications to be a “holistic” approach (whatever that means – it’s a safe assumption is that they would consider more than just your top score).
Knowing the policies of the schools you are applying to is a crucial consideration in your retake decision. If your top two schools are only considering your highest LSAT score, you might be more inclined to have another go at the exam. If you’re looking at schools that consider an average, you’ll want to seriously evaluate whether or not external factors ruined your first test – or whether there are tangible fixes that you can make to your prep this time around, as coming in with a lower score could damage your chances of admission.
Your Timeline
If you are applying for admission to law school for the fall of a given year, you will need to have taken the LSAT satisfactorily by December of the prior calendar year at the latest. The February LSAT is too late to use on an application to law school if you intend to start later that same year.
Do you have enough time to take the LSAT again? A thorough LSAT prep takes 3-5 months. If you are realizing in the middle of October that you did not optimize your LSAT prep the first time around (or perhaps completely underestimated it), will the six weeks remaining until the December test give you enough time to really dive in?
All things considered, what should I do?!
You’ve done a frank assessment of what went wrong for you during your unsatisfactory LSAT(s). You’ve evaluated your prior LSAT prep, the policies of the schools you will be applying to, and your admissions timeline, but you’re still not sure what to do.
Retake if…
If tangible, identifiable factors contributed to your initial, unsatisfactory score(s), you are in a solid position for a retake, provided that there is still time. Valid examples of these factors are:
- Freak happenings on test day (ie. late to the exam, sickness, proctor from hell)
- Lack of preparation
- Poor preparation
Do not retake if…
- If you’re going to be at the same place on repeat test day. Some signs this will occur: You do not have adequate time to make the necessary adjustments and retake the exam before applications are due
- You re-study and you’re still doing about as well as you did before the first LSAT you took
- You have no idea what went wrong leading up to/during your unsatisfactory exam
As we saw in the re-take score table above, most students score only marginally better when retaking the LSAT. As hard as it may be to come to grips with, there does come a point in time when one needs to leave well enough alone, and move on to the next phase of getting in to law school (applications) – or reevaluate one’s plans completely.
Often we see students frustrated by stagnant scores after months and months of quality LSAT prep. The leading cause of this is typically fundamental issues with their reading and/or language skills. There is no doubt that the LSAT rewards people who can read dense material quickly. Conversely, the test can be brutal for very bright students who are not strong readers and/or are not native English speakers. For these students, the root of their problems may not be something that can be addressed in a few months time.
Here’s a little flowchart we put together once upon a time to illustrate some of the points we’ve made. This should be taken with a grain of salt, but not too much.
I hope you found this exercise helpful. As always, if you have any questions, shoot them over to us at StudentServices@manhattanlsat.com. Happy studying!
The LSAT Retake Manifesto, Part 1.
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT Prep, LSAT Tips on October 26th, 2011

Was this your reaction when you saw your LSAT score? Yes? Keep reading.
Each time LSAC releases LSAT scores, there are thousands of test-takers who are less than satisfied with their results. Luckily for those folks, you are allowed to take the LSAT up to three times in any two year period. Unluckily for them, the decision as to whether a retake is “worth it” is hardly a straightforward one. Enter the Manhattan LSAT Retake Manifesto.
In the coming paragraphs, we hope to address all of the concerns that a potential LSAT retaker may have – or really should have – before deciding what their next course of action is.
Initial Considerations
Let’s start with a dose of reality. Most people see very little improvement in their LSAT score after retaking (an average of roughly two points for folks who scored between 150 and 167 the first time), and some even see a decrease in their score. Take a look at the below chart for some analysis of the success of 2010-2011 ‘retakers’ with various initial scores:

*Data courtesy of LSAC.org’s 2010-2011 “repeater” statistics (pdf).
The most important take away from this data is the marginal nature of the score increases that repeat LSAT takers tend to achieve. Just because something is unlikely, however, does not make it impossible, especially when there are some repeaters scoring worse, telling us that some people do significantly better than the 2 or so point average increase. Furthermore, there are very legitimate circumstances that may have applied to your first attempt at the LSAT that prevented you from realizing your full potential.
Check back on Monday for Part 2. There are many pages more of the LSAT Retake Manifesto to come.
October LSAT: Singing the Blues, or Zip-A-Dee-Do-Dah?!
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT Experiences, LSAT news, LSAT Prep on October 6th, 2011
As we lay the October 2011 LSAT to rest, it is important that we remember the legacy it will leave behind. We mustn’t forget the blood, sweat, and tears that went into preparing for this exam. Hopefully, you’re coming off of Saturday’s exam feeling content with your performance. If that’s how it went for you – congratulations! I hope you celebrated properly, and cannot wait to hear about your results.
As for the rest of you, who didn’t quite skip out of the exam center whistling “Zip-A-Dee-Do-Dah“, all is not lost! If you’re certain things did not go well for you on Saturday, you ought a cancel your score (if you haven’t done so already, today is the last day!). And luckily, December is not too late – you can still get in to law school in the Fall 2012 using your scores from the December 2011 LSAT!
What’s important is for you to recognize what’sholding you back from achieving your LSAT goals, and then to do something about it. Here are three common reasons why you might not be seeing the results you wanted:
1) You underestimated the beast that is the LSAT. You knew the LSAT was hard, but you had no idea just how much time and energy was necessary to adequately prepare for the exam. –We see this often—students who expect that a few hours of homework and studying each week will be sufficient for maximizing their potential on this test. Unfortunately, for most people it takes much more than that. Set your sites on the December exam with your expectations adjusted.
2) I just can’t seem to get over the hump on the ___________ section. This is natural. Often students who have been studying for a while start to have a few sections of the exam really “click” for them, while one or two sections remain problem areas. You should embrace this opportunity to hone in on your weak areas and really address what’s holding you back (note: if you’re struggling with Logic Games, consider trying our Logic Games Intensive Course).
3) You prepped hard, but not smart. At Manhattan LSAT, we’re big proponents of self-study. Maybe you’ve been studying on your own, but have never really had a structured approach. This is one of the major advantages of our Self Study program: it gives you structure. It tells you what to focus on, when to focus on it, and how to channel your efforts on a particular question type or exam section. If you’ve chosen to do it yourself, be sure to add some sort of structure. Our Self Study program comes with a syllabus and course recordings, ensuring that you have a very structured plan of attack.
For those of you who are going to continue the LSAT battle from now until the December exam, perhaps we can help. We’re offering a free, live online review of the October exam and have an lsat class beginning October 17th that will prepare you for the December test.
The Strain of ‘Decision Fatigue’
Posted by noah@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT Experiences, LSAT in the news, LSAT Tips on August 29th, 2011
A member of the Manhattan LSAT Forum community – who, like a good lawyer-to-be, is keeping himself anonymous – sent me an interesting article in the NY Times magazine that has some interesting implications for LSAT study. Take a look at the article and what he had to say about it – I think this is spot on:
The article is about “decision fatigue”: how merely making a large number of decisions (whether deciding LSAT questions or deciding your breakfast cereal) leads you to a point where you are more liable to make bad decisions or take shortcuts to avoid having to invest yourself in more decisions. There were a few things I think are relevant to LSAT study:
#1. This could underlie the fatigue students often feel towards the end of an individual test (it’s not just having to read a lot or analyze a lot of logic—it’s literally the act of making so many decisions)
#2. This could definitely underlie LSAT burnout. Having to make so many decisions in a short period of time has a major taxing effect. One test is about 100 decisions—when combined with the other decisions we make from day-to-day that’s a serious workout
#3. The way to recover from decision fatigue is through glucose, so this would support the idea of eating sugary snacks during the break. And that’s not just because you’re using energy in general—in fact making decisions doesn’t use more brain energy, it just shifts what parts of your brain are active.
I found it especially relevant when it said that decision fatigue leads to an otherwise wise person falling for misleading logic or tricks. And perhaps something to take from it aside from how it supports practices already done (like taking some time off before test day, etc.), would be that no matter how good a person is on the LSAT, merely making so many decisions will burn him out. It also may suggest that doing 6 or 7 section tests is not productive—according to the findings a person doesn’t build up more decision energy—they merely learn how to conserve it better. So doing 6 or 7 sections may in a person’s mind take the pressure off when it comes to 5 sections, but if decision fatigue is a major or deciding factor, it would seem that practicing with 6 or 7 sections would have little benefit.
It definitely also shows why it’s so important to do 5 section practice tests because it’s very possible that most people start to feel the effects of decision fatigue especially strongly after 4 sections—that would be the perfect zone for a person to falter.
Interesting stuff! I do think it’s still worthwhile for some people to try doing a 6 section LSAT just to push their mental stamina – learning to conserve your decision energy can actually be useful. It’s good to know when to think a lot, when to pull the trigger, when to simply guess. These are all characteristics of a good test taker.
Speaking of test taking skills, if you are in NYC on September 15th, stop by our office at 6:30 for a free workshop on maximizing your test taking potential.
Bad Test Taker? We’ve Got a Workshop for You
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT Prep, LSAT Tips, Manhattan LSAT Announcements on August 16th, 2011

Slightly More Complicated Than Minesweeper
Comedian Daniel Tosh has a bit in his stand up act poking fun at people who claim they are ‘bad test takers’. He quips:
“Don’t you love it when people in school are like ‘I’m a bad test taker’ — you mean you’re stupid! Oh you struggle with that part where we find out what you know? I know, I can totally relate, see, because I’m a brilliant painter minus my god awful brush strokes.”
While it is incredibly tempting to pick apart the flawed logic used by Mr. Tosh in this analogy, I am simply going to disagree with his overall statement; being a poor test taker does not mean you are stupid, nor are standardized tests an exhaustive or conclusive measure of one’s intellect.
There are many among us who are quite sharp yet don’t excel in the realm of standardized test taking. There’s a TON of pressure, and questions are often phrased in a misleading or confusing way. In the case of the LSAT, the exam writers are constantly setting answer traps to trick you. With all of these obstacles present in most standardized test formats, it is no wonder that many folks simply do not perform well on these exams.
Luckily for you, we at Manhattan Prep have your back. On September 15th we are debuting our first ever “Reaching Your Standardized Testing Potential” workshop in New York City. The session will be run by Jen Dziura, owner of two perfect scores on the GRE. Jen will discuss the various habits and practice routines that can help improve your performance on test day, as well as hack away at some of the intimidating myths surrounding such high stakes exams.
The best part? It’s totally free to register. Join us and begin learning how you can maximize your standardized testing potential.
Are Those Real? The Naked Truth about Fake LSAT Logic Games
Posted by noah@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT content, LSAT Prep, LSAT Tips, Manhattan LSAT Logic Games on August 1st, 2011
.gif)
We are often asked whether or not we use real LSAT games in our class (the answer is YES! The vast majority of the questions featured in class, homework, and from our books are 100% real LSAT questions!), and the question has been asked so many times that the question now reveals more than the answer itself. Someone, at some point, was teaching the LSAT using fake games, and those students were not happy. Whoever that is/was, shame on you – may your pencils be always dull and your erasers leave annoying streaks on your paper.
But, the truth is that our site does sport a rather large number of fake games. What’s up with that? You thought Manhattan LSAT keeps it real; grade A, pure 100% USDA LSAT beef. We do, I swear, but we do like to dip our toes into the world of synthetic LSAT stimulants for extra practice. There are two big reasons for us having fakes. One is that we want to write games that are harder than the usual ones out there so we can push our students’ brains past their usual limits. But the most important reason we have these games is to hone our teacher’s skills. Every one of our teachers must write a logic game as part of his or her training, along with many other curricular and pedagogical challenges (up to but not including having to walk across a bed of coals while reading aloud a reading comp passage).
There are a few interesting challenges to writing an LSAT-like logic game. The first is to write one that is like a game one might see on the LSAT but without actually mimicking a game (it wouldn’t be much of a challenge to simply replace all the nouns and verbs of an existing LSAT game). Along with developing an innovative but realistic game, our teachers-in-training must try to achieve “duh-ness” with their questions. What’s “duh-ness” you ask? Have you ever been working on a question, spending tons of time on testing out answer choices, and then when you get to the right answer and finally see its rightness you say – perhaps aloud – “duh!”? There it is: pure duh-ness. It comes from the fact that the logic game section is designed to test your ability to make inferences, not your ability to do trial-and-error. Lawyers, as far as I can tell from various movies and run-ins with the law, are not doing a lot of trial-and-error when developing legal strategies. Consider switching counsel if you’re on trial for grand larceny and your lawyer says “Hmmm, what sort of defense should I use with this client? I’m feeling lucky, let’s spin the strategy-wheel-of-fortune and find out!” Since the logic games section is testing your ability to make logical inferences not spin your wheels, the right answer is generally something you could reach through a step of logical moves. Thus, the other challenge for our teachers is to avoid writing a game where a ton of trial-and-error is needed to arrive at the right answers, and instead you can solve them through a slick combination of moves.
It sounds like our teachers are getting a lot out of this, but what’s in it for you? Go right ahead and solve our games if you dare – some of them are pretty tough (I’m particularly proud of Jambalaya – one of my gruesome concoctions). In fact, right now we’re running a series where we show a game in two forms – a simple and complex version – to highlight some of the typical twists that the LSAT throws at us. If you want to stretch yourself, try to win the prize for best explanation on our forums, or, even better, write a kick-ass duh-full extra question to one of our games (if you post it on our forums, we’ll test it out in our lab). But, in the end, treat our games like a tasty yet questionably nutritious food – they’re the ice cream of LSAT prep. Real LSAT games and a hearty strategy guide are the meat of your LSAT prep. They are the most duh games around, and they are the meat and potatoes of our curriculum.
If logic games are your bugaboo, consider taking our Live Online Logic Games Intensive Course. This six session course focuses solely on the games section of the exam and is, like all Manhattan LSAT courses, taught by a 99th percentile instructor.
LSAT Prep in Boulder and Denver!
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT news, LSAT Prep, Manhattan LSAT Announcements on July 29th, 2011
We’re going hiking, folks! It’s time to bring some order to the hills of Colorado, and since we don’t have badges or guns, we’ll bring logic. It’s unorthodox, but it doesn’t require special equipment, like chaps.

Manhattan LSAT: Offering Classes on a Foothill Near You
Noah, our Managing Director, has moved to Denver to escape the NYC summer heat, subject himself to 300+ days of sunshine, and live out his dream of actually needing a 4-wheel drive vehicle. He’s still leading the MLSAT charge and he’s about to start up classes in Boulder. So, for all of you college kids who decided to go to school up there for the skiing but now realize you’d rather not work a chair lift after graduation, head to the first session of the Fall class.
Study By Yourself, With Us
Posted by Cory@manhattanlsat.com in LSAT Prep, Manhattan LSAT Announcements on July 15th, 2011
A national epidemic occurs every summer. Perfectly well-adjusted and social people become hermitically-sealed misfits as they prepare for the LSAT. Do you know someone who is suffering from this? Symptoms include, but are not limited to loss of friends, demise of love life, lowering of standards of hygiene, mis-categorization of sharpening fifteen #2 pencils as “a fun night.”
If you have a–cough, cough–friend, who is suffering from sololsatlifeitis, we can help. Have your friend join us every Tuesday night (6-8pm ET) for our online self-study group. There you’ll find like-minded geeks who are restoring their link to the human race while inching towards a 170+ score.
If you’d like to join, here are the rules:
1) You have to be using Manhattan LSAT books (we have other groups that are more free-spirited, but this group is trying to avoid wasting time navigating through multiple approaches)
2) Do the assigned HW and be prepared to discuss it.
3) Show up. One of our teachers generally will do so as well to help.
4) Do NOT talk about fight club. [Editors Note: Shouldn't this be Rule #1?]
If you–I mean your friend–wants to join, create an account on our site if that hasn’t already occurred, e-mail studentservices@manhattanlsat.com and get ready to rumble. (Yes, it’s free.)
Please join us as we work to end the suffering of tens of thousands of young American LSAT-geeks.





